The hip joint can be thought of as a ball and socket joint between which lies a lubricating and protective layer known as cartilage. When cartilage loss occurs (a condition known as arthritis), the patient experiences pain as well as a loss of mobility and function. At that time, a hip replacement may be recommended. A hip replacement involves the removal of the arthritic cartilage and replacing the ball (femoral head) and socket (acetabulum) with artificial parts.
The gold standard of the treatment of end-stage hip arthritis for the last 30 years has been a total hip replacement in which the upper part of the femur (the head and neck) are replaced with a stemmed device and prosthetic head. The socket is replaced with a hemispherical shaped cup, which usually contains a bearing surface comprised of either metal, ceramic, or polyethylene (plastic) material. Total hip replacement is an extremely successful operation that allows patients to return to pain-free activity and improve their quality of life. Unfortunately, over time, prosthetic (artificial) hip implants can wear out as well as loosen. When this occurs, patients encounter pain, a loss of functional ability, and possibly even loss of bone.
The concept of surface replacement, also known as hip resurfacing, originated in the 1970’s as an attempt to preserve bone during the implantation of an artificial hip joint. The first generation of hip resurfacing implants consisted of a metal cap placed on top of the arthritic ball, and a thin plastic socket. Unfortunately, the thin plastic socket wore out quickly, leading to a high failure rate at 10 years. Hip resurfacing was largely abandoned until the 1990’s, when the ability to manufacture a metal ball and socket with precision tolerances became available.
Total Hip and Surface Replacement
With both traditional hip replacement and surface replacement, the socket is inserted in a similar fashion. The two procedures differ in the way the femur is prepared. Whereas traditional hip replacement involves removing the head and neck of the femur, surface replacement preserves this bone (see picture). With a traditional hip replacement, after this bone is removed, a prosthetic ball attached with a stem is inserted within the thigh bone. With a surface replacement, the preserved bone is sculpted to accept a metal cap with a short stem (see picture).
Traditional Total Hip
Image Courtesy of Smith and Nephew
Advantages of Surface Replacement
While every orthopaedic treatment has both benefits and risks, there are some advantages unique to surface replacement.
The preservation of bone has several potential advantages. The first is that more bone is retained in the femur, should another hip replacement become necessary. Over time, any hip replacement may loosen or show signs of wear. In a young, active population, there is a high likelihood that more than one hip replacement operation may be necessary over the lifetime of the patient. The more bone that remains during a revision (re-do) hip operation, the greater the chances of success.
The second advantage to a surface replacement is that the preservation of bone allows for a much larger ball size. This allows for greater stability of the hip joint and a lower risk of dislocation. The dislocation rate after surface replacement of the hip has been shown in some studies to be about 10 times lower than for a traditional hip replacement.
Disadvantages of Surface Replacement
Due to the unique nature of surface replacements and methods employed to perform the surgery, there are some risks which are either limited to surface replacements or occur at a somewhat greater frequency. These include:
Metal ion dispersal
The current generation of surface replacements are metal-on-metal bearings. That means both the ball and the socket are made entirely of metal. Although this cuts down dramatically on the wear and tear of the components, it has been shown to cause metal ions to be dispersed through the body. Cobalt and chromium ions are measurable in the blood stream, but have not been shown to cause cancer or any other disease in humans. Although the metal ions are measurable, no one knows what a safe level is. Generally, people with functioning kidneys are able to excrete the ions in their urine.
Because the bone of the femur is retained, it is possible to fracture it after surface replacement. Most of the fractures occur early in the post-operative period if too much weight is put on the leg too early. The body needs time to adapt to the new prosthesis. Post-operatively, crutches are used for 3-4 weeks to protect the amount of weight put on the leg. With current techniques and rehabilitation protocol, the risk of fracture is less than 2%.
While not limited to surface replacement, working around the bone of the femur may cause extra pressure to be put on the nerves in the hip area. This may cause a transient weakness of some of the muscles of the leg in less than 1% of cases.
Surface replacement may require a somewhat larger incision and exposure than that of total hip arthroplasty. As such, the hip resurfacing procedure may lead to extra bone forming around the hip, leading to stiffness, called heterotopic ossification. We take measures to prevent this, using either an anti-inflammatory medication or one dose of radiation to the hip area after surgery. The radiation treatment, known as XRT (external radiation therapy), is performed in the first 2 days after surgery and does not have any association with cancer. With preventative measures, the risk of extra bone forming is less than 2%.
Allergy to the metals
A very small percentage of patients (less than 1%) have been found to develop allergy to the metals used in hip resurfacing. Unfortunately, there is no available test to determine this before surgery. Since all hip resurfacings are currently made of the same metals, there is a possibility of an allergic response to all resurfacing impalnts. If a patient develops an allergy to the metals used in hip resurfacing, he/she may have pain and swelling around the hip joint. Treatment may require a removal of the implant and revision surgery to a non-metal-on-metal hip replacement.
Unknowns of Surface Replacements
At this time, it is not clear what limitations of activity patients with surface replacements should adhere to. With traditional bearing surfaces such as polyethylene or ceramics, repetitive impact has been associated with accelerated wear and even potential catastrophic breakage. Whether this will occur with the current metal-on-metal bearings such as those used in surface replacements is not known.
Longevity of Implant
The short term results (4-6 year follow-up) of hip resurfacing are encouraging. However, the early failures of hip resurfacing appear to be greater than for total hip replacement (2.2% vs 1.9%), with the majority of the early failures due to femoral neck fracture. Whether the newer forms of hip resurfacing will be successful long term is unknown. We are carefully tracking the results of hip resurfacing in our hip replacement outcome study: "Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Total Joint Replacement: The SPARSH HOSPITAL Hip Arthroplasty Cohort." We will be reporting our results at significant intervals of follow-up. However, it may require 10 years or longer to determine whether this newer form of hip resurfacing is as good as total hip replacement at comparable time intervals.
Improvements in hip implant design as well as materials are frequent in joint replacement. Extensive prospective clinical trials over many years are necessary to determine the long term outcome and the true benefits and risks of new innovations. Should you be a candidate for hip replacement, a discussion regarding your options for treatment with your physician is recommended. Only your surgeon can advise you on the option best suited for your unique circumstances and, if necessary, which procedure is best for you.